I read recently of a decision by New York State’s Board of
Regents eliminating the requirement that high school students complete a year’s
study of both US History and Global History in order to graduate.
Apparently, this decision is related to the so-called “Common
Core” movement which – unlike Ebola – has reached epidemic proportions in this
country.
As an old history teacher, I was, of course, dismayed. But on reflection, the Regents’ decision struck
me as a matter of little significance – something akin to the moment when Butch
and Sundance are about to jump off an absurdly high cliff into the river below. Sundance worries that he can’t swim, and
Butch laughs: “Why, you crazy – the
fall’ll probably kill ya!”
This country’s educational system does such a poor job of
teaching history that – unless we dramatically change things – we’re already
doomed as a free society. Of all the
subjects which citizens can study, the only one which offers any preparation
for meeting the challenges of the future is the study of the past.
For, if history doesn’t precisely repeat itself, there are
patterns. An understanding of history
is, for a society, analogous to the wisdom an individual gains over the course
of a long life. Everyone makes
mistakes. Those who survive those
mistakes – and learn from them – have a shot at wisdom.
History is a society’s collective wisdom.
America’s educational system gave up on History during the
Vietnam era, when colleges and universities expanded rapidly to profit from the
tuitions of hundreds of thousands of young men who didn’t want to go to
war. Arriving in unprecedented numbers,
this influx of students – whose interest in college had far more to do with
survival than learning – demanded all sorts of absurd “reforms”.
Among these was the elimination of general education
requirements. Before 1960, most American
colleges and universities required that all students take a set of core
subjects – American History, Western Civ, English and American Lit, Composition,
a couple of science courses, one foreign language to the level of basic fluency
– even physical education.
Your prospective major made no difference. Future lawyers took calculus. Future rocket scientists studied poetry. Everyone grumbled through calisthenics and ran
laps. And everyone learned a respectable
smattering of the history of their country and the civilization from which it
sprang.
Which – in terms of the survival American democracy – was the
most important part of this common curriculum.
Because History – along with its allied subjects, biography and geography
– is the absolute prerequisite for intelligent, active citizenship in a
democracy.
It was probably a good thing, in those days, that future
lawyers and politicians had to sweat through elementary calculus. Higher math teaches humility – something today’s
lawyers and politicians clearly lack.
It was probably good, too, that future scientists, physicians,
and engineers learned a little literature.
The more we push back the frontiers of knowledge – the more we find
ourselves able to do – the more we need some basis for thinking about what it
all means. Those are the questions which
poets and playwrights have been wrestling with for millennia.
But what was indispensable was that all college-educated
Americans – those whose educational attainments would make them the natural
leaders of their future communities – learned something about history.
History is the essential study of the leader. Always has been. Always will be.
Read up on any great leader, of any nation, from any period, and
you will find that he or she not only studied history as a young person – but
continued to read and study it as an adult.
History teaches us many things. Above all, because the patterns within and
among human societies tend to repeat themselves, history teaches us to
recognize dangers before they become obvious – or before it’s too late.
Some years ago, when reasonable people could still question
the dangers of anthropogenic global climate change, I wrote a piece comparing
Al Gore’s efforts to alert Americans to this danger with Winston Churchill’s
efforts to alert Britain to the dangers of Adolf Hitler.
One angry reader responded, furiously insisting that Gore was
no Churchill. He missed the point, which
was that democratic societies – confronted with a threat calling for
self-discipline, sacrifice, and years of unrelenting effort – will go through
all sorts of contortions to deny that a threat is real.
Democracies are fortunate if they have prominent leaders
willing to risk telling citizens things they don’t want to hear.
History teaches leaders how
to lead – by adopting the successful methods, and avoiding the mistakes, of
those who have gone before.
Lincoln was a lifelong student of George Washington – and,
before taking office, he read up on the presidency of Andrew Jackson, who had
faced an earlier secession crisis.
Theodore Roosevelt was a devoted student of Lincoln, and
actually wrote a biography of Alexander Hamilton.
As wartime leader of Great Britain, Winston Churchill faced
the necessity of pulling together a coalition of incompatible partners to
prevent Hitler’s Germany from conquering the world. In the decade before he took power, Churchill
wrote a six-volume biography of his ancestor, John Churchill, Duke of
Marlborough, a brilliant diplomat and soldier of the late 17th and
early 18th centuries.
Serving William III and Queen Anne, Marlborough had pulled
together a coalition of incompatible partners to prevent Louis XIV’s France
from conquering Europe.
Churchill, you might say, spent the 1930s doing his homework.
A country led by serious students of history can achieve
remarkable things. A country led by
those ignorant of history risks disaster.
Because America no longer teaches its citizens history, it must
soon either cease to be a great country, or cease to be a democracy – ceding
power to an educated elite who have
taken the trouble to learn it.
By far the safer course is to teach our children the history they
will need to govern themselves.
But to do so, we will need to overrule an educational elite
which does not understand history because – having attended college since 1970
– they never learned it.
No comments:
Post a Comment