There are times when it’s pleasant to imagine how things might
have been different.
Because I’ve always been interested in history and politics, I
sometimes imagine what might have happened had one or two things shifted just a
tiny bit.
My favorite alternate reality begins by imagining that Teddy
Roosevelt had never made that silly, unconsidered promise not to seek a third
term in 1908.
By 1912, Teddy had his party’s conservative establishment on
the run. Given his popularity and the
enormous support he could rally by means of the “bully pulpit”, the
possibilities would have been stunning.
Had TR run for a third term, he might well have taken the United
States decisively – even irreversibly – in the direction of a social democracy,
anticipating Europe by decades.
And that’s not even to discuss how much early American
intervention into World War I would have altered the tragic outcome of that
war.
I spend less time imagining that someone had stopped Sirhan
Sirhan from assassinating Bobby Kennedy on the night Bobby won the 1968
California primary.
I’m not sure RFK would have won the Democratic nomination that
year – given the immense control LBJ wielded over the Democratic Party. But it’s hard to imagine that RFK wouldn’t
have made it to the Oval Office in 1972, or 1976. And from there, it’s not hard to imagine him
leading us toward a far more progressive future.
But my most tragic “what if” involves the Election of
2000 - and it has nothing to do with recounts or “hanging chads”.
I imagine what would have happened if Bill Clinton had
resigned from office after being impeached by the House of Representatives in
December, 1998.
And on this, my feeling are heightened, because - at the time - I publicly
called for Clinton’s resignation at precisely that time. I had not influence, and no one really noticed. But I'm on the record.
Please understand. I
had voted for Mr. Clinton twice. And I tend
to think a public man’s private life has nothing to do with his fitness to serve
– though I do bar lying, baldly and directly, to the American people.
But what I was mainly thinking about was America’s
future. I imagined then, and I imagine
now, what might have happened if Al Gore had taken office in late 1998, or even
better, on January 21, 1999 (which would have allowed him to run for two
additional terms).
I imagine President Al Gore taking office, and gradually
getting past the damage inflicted upon the nation by Clinton’s misconduct and
subsequent efforts to avoid the consequences of his actions.
I imagine an incumbent President Gore running for election in
his own right in 2000 – with all the advantages of the incumbency, and with the
stain of the Clinton era a year and more behind him.
I imagine a President Gore in office during the 9/11 crisis –
dealing forcefully with the Afghan Taliban, but not getting drawn into a
foolish invasion of Iraq.
I imagine no Iraq War; no No Child Left Behind; and a far more
competent – or less incompetent – handling of Hurricane Katrina.
Most of all, I imagine the United States, led by President
Gore, moving into a place of world leadership in dealing with Global Climate
Change.
The world would be a very different place, if Al Gore had been
president instead of George W. Bush.
And, as the incumbent, there’s almost no way Gore would have
lost to George W. Bush, or any other Republican who ran in 2000.
And here’s the point:
When friends question why I have problems with Hillary Clinton,
there are many things I could mention. But
my problem with her is really a problem with them. And it comes down to –
not something they did – but something they didn’t
do.
When they had a chance to do the honorable thing – to have
Bill resign in favor of his Vice-President – they opted to cling to power.
Not for the country.
Not even for the party.
For themselves.
And the cost to the rest of us, to the world, and to the
future, has been measureless.
Again, take a few minutes to imagine a United States in which
the George W. Bush years had been, instead, the Al Gore years.
Really think about that.
Then ask yourself whether, in the supreme crisis of their political lives, either of the Clintons demonstrated
an instinct to put their country, or its people, ahead of their own interests.
To me, they simply didn't.
And this, I think, is the ultimate disqualifier.
1 comment:
Yes, I'm persuaded that for both Clintons "public service" is really personal aggrandizement. Another fine thought-provoking piece, Rick.
Post a Comment