Wednesday, December 20, 2006

No Virginia, There's No Obama Claus!

[Owing to the hustle and bustle of the Christmas season, I've opted to post my piece in this week's Village News rather than write something uniquely for Gray's Gazette. I trust you will find it worthwhile. RG]


I was probably eight or nine when I started questioning the stories. Anyway, old enough to have mastered long division and to have a basic grasp of geography.

I asked Dad how many people lived in the world. Armed with this information, I did two calculations.

Assuming, naively, that most people lived in families like ours, I divided Dad’s figure by four to derive the number of houses in the world. I divided the result by 24, which I took to be the number of hours Santa Claus – by following the sun – would have to complete his deliveries in a single night.

Studying the result – the number of houses ­per hour Santa would have to visit – I drew the only logical conclusion. Which was fine, until I decided to share it with my little sister, who didn’t take it well.

Dad then sat me down for a serious talk about the difference between being a good thinker and a good big brother.

This episode stays with me – as does the moral Dad drew. It’s great if a little kid can use logic and long division to solve childhood’s most urgent existential problem – but nobody likes the bearer of ill tidings.

Which is why I approach today’s topic with some trepidation.

At present, all over America, desperate Democrats, liberal independents, idealistic youth, and disciples of Oprah are working themselves into a frenzy about Senator Barack Obama. They’re starting to believe – they want so much to believe – that this bright, engaging young politician is the answer to our nation’s prayers.

And I can’t see it.

Senator Obama might someday be president – perhaps even a great one. But if he runs now – on the message that has propelled him to such sudden and remarkable popularity – I fear he’s doomed to failure.

Because Senator Obama is suggesting that we can have Christmas all year ‘round. He’s selling America the heartwarming Hollywood ending in which everyone comes together as one – the final scene of It’s a Wonderful Life; the cheering crowd scenes at the end of Rocky II, Hoosiers, and a hundred underdog films; Tinker Bell reviving because we all believe – and clap our hands.

Senator Obama has latched onto the popular illusion that democracy would be ever so nice if we all set aside our personal interests, freed ourselves from hatred and prejudice, and dismissed our philosophical differences as just so much idle speculation.

He’s asking why we can’t all get along – and ignoring the obvious answer.

Because we’re not saints.

In this real world, each of us pursues real interests and ambitions. All of us are hampered by hatreds and prejudices inherited from our backgrounds or engendered by personal experiences. And none of us knows everything – or understands everything he knows.

Because this is so, in any society, conflict is inevitable. Especially in a free and democratic society.

We may tell pollsters that we want an end to partisan politics – but pollsters seldom ask which of our personal interests or beliefs we’d be willing to sacrifice for the sake of unity.

Thus, polls fail to disclose that the only bipartisanship most of us would actually accept is one in which those who disagree with us shut up and allowed us to do things our way.

And that’s precisely why Senator Obama is not – and cannot be – what so many Americans want him to be.

He’s obviously an attractive candidate. He might even ride this hunger for unity to the White House.

But once in office, he’d have decisions to make. Every decision would produce winners and losers. And very quickly, Americans would begin to remember that – barring exceptional times of emergency, mourning or celebration – a President can’t really bring us together.

No one can.

At this season, we celebrate the birth of an infant who grew up to preach a gospel of universal brotherhood and peace.

He was killed for it – as were Martin Luther King, Jr., Mohandas K. Gandhi, and thousands of others, famous and obscure, across the bloody pages of human history.

Which is not to say that the dream – of unity, brotherhood, universal peace – is a lie. The dream is as real as Santa Claus.

But it isn’t the end of the story.

On the day after Christmas, after a long hot bath and lots of Ben-Gay, Santa must start planning the logistics for next Christmas. George Bailey must reopen the Building & Loan and start figuring out how to repay his neighbors’ generosity.

And we must all face jobs and homework; bills, mortgages, and tuition; and the thousand-and-one challenges involved in the pursuit of happiness in a fast-paced, complex society.

Which is why Christmas is so essential. We need this time – so rare in the calendar – to set aside our differences and celebrate the things that unite us.

But what makes Christmas essential is precisely what makes a perpetual Christmas impossible.

Just like the sort of bloodless, non-partisan unity Senator Obama is selling.

1 comment:

Mark Ingram said...

Rick....

You are right on the mark with this...Senator Obama will one day make a good or even great president but as you have so eloquently put it....not this time.
He needs to sharpen his message to a point of political and social realities rather than the 'way we wish it were' scenarios.
He should be given consideration as a serious vice presidential candidate and if the Democrats can put together a winning ticket in '08...and he serves with distinction and is effective in the vice presidency...then he can lay claim to the nomination if he chooses....in 2016...assuming the Democratic party gets back on track and the results of the '08 election are as we fervently hope they will be.

What the Democratic Party needs far beyond Senator Obama's rhetoric is someone who can get us all singing from the same sheet of music. This is only going to happen when that SOMEONE with the help of other like-minded individuals define and project a coherent and workable solution for what the current administration has gotten us involved in domesticaly and on the international scene as well.

Who that might be .....I havent a clue .....yet.

There are a few interesting possibilities on the horizon....some are closer than the horizon blotting out the view of who just may be out there with something to say and should be heard.....but in the coming months, as this next race for the White House begins to take shape, there will be a winnowing out of the wannabes and those who have the 'message' and are serious about changing the direction of this country will move to the fore and THEN we will have some choices to make.

With the message he is professing at the present Senator Obama wouldnt be my choice for VP right now either....his view has to change to include the things in this country that MUST change and eliminate the 'feel good' things he so devoutly professes now.

Keep writing.....I like the way you think.


Mark Ingram
Hopewell